| Title |
Circadian Rhythms of Perineuronal Net Composition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eNeuro, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1523/eneuro.0034-19.2020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harry Pantazopoulos, Barbara Gisabella, Lindsay Rexrode, David Benefield, Emrah Yildiz, Phoebe Seltzer, Jake Valeri, Gabriele Chelini, Anna Reich, Magdalena Ardelt, Sabina Berretta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 37 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#426,963
of 23,588,018 outputs
Outputs from eNeuro
#62
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,775
of 400,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eNeuro
#7
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,588,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.